I guess I can understand why some might be skeptical despite the evidence thus provided on this site. Behold the Void Ab Initio warrant that started my railroading. As you can see the warrant’s first page, it is void (invalid) on its face (legalize for obviously) because it says it’s for “Nebraska and elsewhere” and it’s signed by a Magistrate Judge named Gosset who didn’t have any authority to issue a warrant for “elsewhere” or anywhere outside of the district of Nebraska. (See US v Horton for the particulars). In sum, the NIT Warrant was challenged on this ground (being void ab initio) in a subsequent case (Operation Pacifier 2015) and all the circuits gave the FBI the “good faith” exception without acknowledging that this was their second (Operation Torpedo 2012 was first) infraction. Therefore had any of the Operation Torpedo defense lawyers been competent, Operation Pacifier wouldn’t have happened…
On the second page you can see that the “NIT” was deployed at 7pm on November 18, 2012. If you view the graphic on my about page you’ll see that my IP is accused of loading two html files from TB2 @ 7:12 & 7:15pm CST. That means the only time my IP visited TB2 was 12 and 15 minutes after the NIT was deployed on TB2 and my IP never visited the site again during the two week sting operation. Which, or course, is suspicious…
On the third page, you can see that the NIT will deploy to any IP address that loads any page on TB2, regardless of what caused the request. For example, a redirect or an iframe call will all be considered “accessing”, this – of course – is nonsense.
On the Final page you can see that the FBI lied about what they were searching for because, as the new expert report, indicated: “A unique session identifier sent by Hidden Service B” doesn’t exist because Tinyboard doesn’t issue session ids to visitors.
voidadinitio